Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Salt Creek Commons Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 18127051006 · Porter County, IN · pop 4,114 · 22% of tract blocks fall in Salt Creek Commons

Here is how census tract 18127051006, in Salt Creek Commons in Porter County, looks to a landlord: a 3.8/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 4,114. It lands near the 9th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

9% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,479 a month against an average household income of $83,811 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 14% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,437
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate16.1%
Median income$83,811

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Salt Creek Commons
Moderate
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#13 of 42 tracts In Porter County
Elevated
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#1,062 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Low
National
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#58,384 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Salt Creek Commons and the region

Centroid at 41.4929, -87.1778 · click any tract to drill in

Why Salt Creek Commons scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Salt Creek Commons
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.1% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,479 rent vs county FMR
7.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Salt Creek Commons
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Salt Creek Commons
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Salt Creek Commons
5.2

How Salt Creek Commons compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Salt Creek Commons risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 051006Salt Creek Commons: 2.12.1Salt Creek Commonsparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 1.54%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.8%Peak (2014)
  • 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Salt Creek Commons

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 7.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Salt Creek Commons, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Porter County average of 4.5 and below the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 18127051006

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18127051006?

Census tract 18127051006 in Salt Creek Commons scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18127051006?

Median gross rent is $1,479/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18127051006?

16.1% of residents in tract 18127051006 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,114.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18127051006?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 9th, minority 41th, housing 18th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 18127051006?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 18127051006 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.54% of renter households, peaking at 1.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 18127051006 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 18127051006 compare to Salt Creek Commons overall?

Tract 18127051006 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Salt Creek Commons at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Salt Creek Commons; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related