Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally
Fontana Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 20121100500 ·
Miami County, KS · pop 4,710 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Fontana
20121100500 is a census tract in Fontana, KS. It scores 3.3/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,710. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 5%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,866
Renter share10.2%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$98,158
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fontana
Moderate
Within county
43th percentile
#5 of 8 tracts In Miami County
Moderate
Within state
46th percentile
#451 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Moderate
National
27th percentile
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fontana and the region
Centroid at 38.4861, -94.8227 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fontana scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fontana
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,066 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fontana
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fontana
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fontana
2.1
How Fontana compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
26%Socioeconomic
38%Household composition
22%Racial/ethnic minority
22%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.5%Housing insecurity
6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
9.5%Food insecurity
5.3%SNAP enrollment
5.5%Transit barriers
7.3%No health insurance
15.2%Frequent mental distress
30.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fontana
24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10. 47% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Miami County average of 37.5%.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 5.3% against 15.2% nationally.
Court records carry 3 eviction filings across 1 observed years. Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally. Filings peaked in 2000 at 1.7% of renter households.
In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 10% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $98,158, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 20121100500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20121100500?
Census tract 20121100500 in Fontana scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20121100500?
Median gross rent is $1,066/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20121100500?
7.8% of residents in tract 20121100500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,710.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20121100500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 38th, minority 22th, housing 22th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 20121100500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 20121100500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.68% of renter households, peaking at 1.7% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 20121100500 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 20121100500 compare to Fontana overall?
Tract 20121100500 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Fontana at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fontana; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.