Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Cannonsburg Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 21019031101 · Boyd County, KY · pop 4,123 · 10% of tract blocks fall in Cannonsburg
Census tract 21019031101 covers part of Cannonsburg, KY, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,123 residents. The severe-burden share is 39%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,924
Renter share20.2%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$82,518
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
21
th percentile
Low
Within state
27
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cannonsburg and the region
Centroid at 38.3476, -82.6808 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cannonsburg scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cannonsburg
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
Kentucky legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$795 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cannonsburg
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cannonsburg
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cannonsburg
3.4
How Cannonsburg compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 6%Racial/ethnic minority
- 29%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cannonsburg
51% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Boyd County average of 36.2%. The main counterweight is eviction-process difficulty at 1.7/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.1/10.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.4/10. Against the Boyd County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.
On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $82,518, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the KY average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Average gross rent is $795, close to the Cannonsburg average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 21019031101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 21019031101?
Census tract 21019031101 in Cannonsburg scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 21019031101?
Median gross rent is $795/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 21019031101?
10.0% of residents in tract 21019031101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,123.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 21019031101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 34th, minority 6th, housing 29th.
Q5
How does tract 21019031101 compare to Cannonsburg overall?
Tract 21019031101 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Cannonsburg at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cannonsburg; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related