Tract 21211040101 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 21211040101 · Shelby County, KY · pop 3,887
Tract 21211040101 sits in Shelby County, KY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.5/10. Population here is 3,887. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Shelby County and the region
Centroid at 38.1176, -85.1140 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 21211040101 scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 21211040101 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 36
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 22%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 51%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 7Total filings over 2 yrs
- 1.44%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.4%Peak (2006)
- 3Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What drives eviction risk in Tract 21211040101
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.6/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.1/10.
11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The filing record is not thin: 7 evictions over 2 years of observation.
Filings peaked in 2006 at 1.4% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 4.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Against average income of $84,507, annual rent is just 11%. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
20% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.