Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Aspen Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pasadena
Tract 24003731313 · Anne Arundel County, MD · pop 3,704 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 24003731313 covers part of the Aspen Park area of Pasadena, MD, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,704. Severe burden reaches 64%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,379
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate1.6%
Median income$97,173
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
48
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pasadena and the region
Centroid at 39.1362, -76.5593 · click any tract to drill in
Why Aspen Park scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
8.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
1.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,165 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
5.8
How Aspen Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 59%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Aspen Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.3%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.4%Food insecurity
- 8.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 25.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Aspen Park
Cost burden runs 64% here against 44.5% across Anne Arundel County. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.9/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.9/10. At $2,165 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Pasadena commands.
On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 1.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
It tracks the Anne Arundel County average of 5.1 closely. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $97,173.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 24003731313
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24003731313?
Census tract 24003731313 in the Aspen Park neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24003731313?
Median gross rent is $2,165/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24003731313?
1.6% of residents in tract 24003731313 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,704.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24003731313?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 10th, minority 59th, housing 1th.
Q5
Is tract 24003731313 considered part of Aspen Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24003731313 fall within Aspen Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 24003731313 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 24003731313 compare to Pasadena overall?
Tract 24003731313 scores 5.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Pasadena at 5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena
Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related