Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Lake Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cockeysville

Tract 24005408506 · Baltimore County, MD · pop 4,957 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Tract 24005408506 sits in the Silver Lake area of Cockeysville, MD, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.7/10. Population here is 4,957. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 10/10.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 52% Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units2,392
Renter share93.1%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$71,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Silver Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Cockeysville
High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 219 tracts In Baltimore County
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#155 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cockeysville and the region

Centroid at 39.4707, -76.6089 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Lake scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cockeysville
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.4
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,454 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cockeysville
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cockeysville
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cockeysville
6.1

How Silver Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.7This tracttract 4085066.6Cockeysvilleparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Lake

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.7/10. 93% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. It sits 2.0 points above the Baltimore County average of 5.7.

The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.

Food insecurity runs 27.0% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,454, 9% below the Cockeysville average. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

On the national scale it lands near the 89th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 24005408506

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24005408506?

Census tract 24005408506 in the Silver Lake neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24005408506?

Median gross rent is $1,454/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24005408506?

14.7% of residents in tract 24005408506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,957.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24005408506?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 30th, minority 80th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 24005408506 considered part of Silver Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24005408506 fall within Silver Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24005408506 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24005408506 compare to Cockeysville overall?

Tract 24005408506 scores 7.7/10, higher than the parent city of Cockeysville at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cockeysville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cockeysville

Top eight tracts in Cockeysville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related