Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Rosemont Eviction Risk: Moderate , Baltimore Highlands

Tract 24005430104 · Baltimore County, MD · pop 2,904 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Here is how census tract 24005430104, in the Rosemont area of Baltimore eviction risk Highlands, looks to a landlord: a 6.7/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 2,904. It lands near the 90th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 31% of renter households, a high level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,582 a month while the average household earns $76,842 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 12% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 9% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,032
Renter share12.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$76,842

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Rosemont
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Baltimore Highlands
Moderate
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 219 tracts In Baltimore County
High
Within state
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#315 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Baltimore Highlands and the region

Centroid at 39.2369, -76.6372 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosemont scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Baltimore Highlands
8.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.4
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,582 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Baltimore Highlands
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Baltimore Highlands
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Baltimore Highlands
7.3

How Rosemont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosemont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 430104Baltimore Highland: 6.56.5Baltimore Highlandparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rosemont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosemont

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Baltimore eviction risk Highlands, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Baltimore County average of 6.7 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24005430104

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24005430104?

Census tract 24005430104 in the Rosemont neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24005430104?

Median gross rent is $1,582/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24005430104?

15.0% of residents in tract 24005430104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,904.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24005430104?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 52th, minority 53th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 24005430104 considered part of Rosemont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24005430104 fall within Rosemont (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24005430104 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24005430104 compare to Baltimore Highlands overall?

Tract 24005430104 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Baltimore Highlands at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Baltimore eviction risk Highlands; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 24005430104 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Baltimore Highlands

Top eight tracts in Baltimore Highlands ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related