Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally
Green Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Walkersville
Tract 24021740200 · Frederick County, MD · pop 5,344 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 3.1/10, tract 24021740200 in the Green Village area of Walkersville, MD reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,344. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,926
Renter share10.8%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate1.9%
Median income$150,526
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Walkersville and the region
Centroid at 39.4924, -77.3630 · click any tract to drill in
Why Green Village scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Walkersville
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
1.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,244 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Walkersville
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Walkersville
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Walkersville
3.4
How Green Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 23%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 38%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.4%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 6.3%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 22.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Green Village
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10.
The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 1.2 points below the Frederick County average of 4.3. Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,244, 16% below the Walkersville average. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.1/10. Against average income of $150,526, annual rent is just 10%.
Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 24021740200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24021740200?
Census tract 24021740200 in the Green Village neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24021740200?
Median gross rent is $1,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24021740200?
1.9% of residents in tract 24021740200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,344.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24021740200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 23th, minority 32th, housing 38th.
Q5
Is tract 24021740200 considered part of Green Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24021740200 fall within Green Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 24021740200 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 24021740200 compare to Walkersville overall?
Tract 24021740200 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Walkersville at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Walkersville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Walkersville
Top eight tracts in Walkersville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related