Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Exeter Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Pleasant Hills

Tract 24025303400 · Harford County, MD · pop 4,648 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Exeter Green in Pleasant Hills anchors census tract 24025303400, which lands at 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 65% of US census tracts.

About 32% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,687 monthly, set against $140,246 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 4% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,816
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$140,246

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Exeter Green
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pleasant Hills
Moderate
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 59 tracts In Harford County
Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,267 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pleasant Hills and the region

Centroid at 39.4878, -76.3780 · click any tract to drill in

Why Exeter Green scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$2,687 rent vs county FMR
8.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
3.4

How Exeter Green compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Exeter Green risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 303400Pleasant Hills: 5.35.3Pleasant Hillsparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Exeter Green

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pleasant Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harford County average of 6.0 and below the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 24025303400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24025303400?

Census tract 24025303400 in the Exeter Green neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24025303400?

Median gross rent is $2,687/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24025303400?

6.2% of residents in tract 24025303400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,648.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24025303400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 28th, minority 23th, housing 0th.
Q5

Is tract 24025303400 considered part of Exeter Green?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24025303400 fall within Exeter Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24025303400 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24025303400 compare to Pleasant Hills overall?

Tract 24025303400 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Pleasant Hills at 5.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pleasant Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related