Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Queensland Eviction Risk: Lower , Marlton
Tract 24033800707 ·
Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,439 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 24033800707 (Queensland in Marlton, Maryland) comes in at 6.5/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #10,912 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 80% of renter households, a severe level, and 63% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,288 monthly, set against $101,164 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%Stable renters 3%Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,391
Renter share17.3%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$101,164
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Queensland
Very High
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Marlton
Moderate
Within county
34th percentile
#142 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
33th percentile
#977 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Marlton and the region
Centroid at 38.8052, -76.7913 · click any tract to drill in
Why Queensland scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Marlton
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,288 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Marlton
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Marlton
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Marlton
3.8
How Queensland compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 65
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
38%Socioeconomic
42%Household composition
91%Racial/ethnic minority
89%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
156Total filings over 4 yrs
16.11%Avg annual filing rate
42.8%Peak (2014)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2011 to 2016
Filings dropped 92% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Queensland. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
17.3%Housing insecurity
10.8%Utility-shutoff threat
19.5%Food insecurity
14.2%SNAP enrollment
9.2%Transit barriers
9.1%No health insurance
13.5%Frequent mental distress
28.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Queensland
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 5.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Marlton, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 156 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 16.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 42.8% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 24033800707
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033800707?
Census tract 24033800707 in the Queensland neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24033800707?
Median gross rent is $1,288/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 80% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24033800707?
8.6% of residents in tract 24033800707 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,439.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24033800707?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 42th, minority 91th, housing 89th.
Q5
Is tract 24033800707 considered part of Queensland?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033800707 fall within Queensland (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033800707?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 156 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033800707 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.11% of renter households, peaking at 42.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 24033800707 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 24033800707 compare to Marlton overall?
Tract 24033800707 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Marlton at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Marlton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.