Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally

Queensland Eviction Risk: Lower , Marlton

Tract 24033800707 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,439 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 24033800707 sits in the Queensland area of Queensland, MD, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.8/10. It is home to 3,439 residents. 63% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 3% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,391
Renter share17.3%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$101,164

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Queensland
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Marlton
Moderate
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#141 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,176 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Marlton and the region

Centroid at 38.8052, -76.7913 · click any tract to drill in

Why Queensland scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Marlton
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,288 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Marlton
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Marlton
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Marlton
3.8

How Queensland compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Queensland risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.8This tracttract 8007074.0Marltonparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 156Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 16.11%Avg annual filing rate
  • 42.8%Peak (2014)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033800707
Filings dropped 92% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Queensland. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Queensland

Cost burden runs 80% here against 45.6% across Prince George's County. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.1/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 9/10. Against the Prince George's County average of 4.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 156 filings here across 4 tracked years.

Filings peaked in 2014 at 42.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 16.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 17% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $101,164, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033800707

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033800707?

Census tract 24033800707 in the Queensland neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033800707?

Median gross rent is $1,288/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 80% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033800707?

8.6% of residents in tract 24033800707 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,439.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033800707?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 42th, minority 91th, housing 89th.
Q5

Is tract 24033800707 considered part of Queensland?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033800707 fall within Queensland (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033800707?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 156 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033800707 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.11% of renter households, peaking at 42.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033800707 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033800707 compare to Marlton overall?

Tract 24033800707 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Marlton at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Marlton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related