Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Broadview Eviction Risk: Lower , Camp Springs

Tract 24033801901 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 5,044 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Here is how census tract 24033801901, in the Broadview area of Camp Springs, looks to a landlord: a 6.2/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 5,044. It lands near the 80th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 20% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,454 a month against an average household income of $126,932 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 6% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,657
Renter share7.5%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$126,932

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Broadview
Moderate
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Camp Springs
Low
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#148 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#1,031 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camp Springs and the region

Centroid at 38.8084, -76.9269 · click any tract to drill in

Why Broadview scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camp Springs
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,454 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camp Springs
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camp Springs
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camp Springs
4.6

How Broadview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Broadview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 801901Camp Springs: 6.26.2Camp Springsparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 42Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 11.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.5%Peak (2012)
  • 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338019012011: 10 filings (11.76/100 renter HHs)2012: 14 filings (16.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (11.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Broadview

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camp Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and below the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 42 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 11.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.5% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801901?

Census tract 24033801901 in the Broadview neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801901?

Median gross rent is $2,454/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801901?

7.6% of residents in tract 24033801901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,044.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 38th, minority 96th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801901 considered part of Broadview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801901 fall within Broadview (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 42 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.14% of renter households, peaking at 16.5% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801901 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801901 compare to Camp Springs overall?

Tract 24033801901 scores 2.1/10, lower than the parent city of Camp Springs at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camp Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camp Springs

Top eight tracts in Camp Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related