Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Berkshire Eviction Risk: Moderate , District Heights

Tract 24033802301 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,306 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 24033802301 covers part of the Berkshire area of District Heights, MD, and scores 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. 5% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Prince George's County average of 45.6%.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 10% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,119
Renter share10.6%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate13.6%
Median income$110,865

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Berkshire
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In District Heights
Moderate
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#111 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Moderate
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#945 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across District Heights and the region

Centroid at 38.8571, -76.8906 · click any tract to drill in

Why Berkshire scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from District Heights
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
13.6% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,435 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from District Heights
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from District Heights
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from District Heights
7.7

How Berkshire compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Berkshire risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 8023014.6District Heightsparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 67

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 19Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 2.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.5%Peak (2014)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033802301
Filings dropped 33% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Berkshire. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Berkshire

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.1/10. Running hot, regional political climate reads 9/10.

Food insecurity runs 26.8% against 17.8% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 19 filings here across 4 tracked years.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2014, when 3.5% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #37,882 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $110,865, annual rent is just 16%.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033802301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033802301?

Census tract 24033802301 in the Berkshire neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033802301?

Median gross rent is $1,435/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 5% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033802301?

13.6% of residents in tract 24033802301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,306.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033802301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 18th, minority 93th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 24033802301 considered part of Berkshire?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033802301 fall within Berkshire (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033802301?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033802301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.51% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033802301 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033802301 compare to District Heights overall?

Tract 24033802301 scores 4.7/10, right in line with the parent city of District Heights at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from District Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related