Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally
Northeast Boundary Eviction Risk: Moderate , Seat Pleasant
Tract 24033802901 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,941 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
How risky is Northeast Boundary in Seat Pleasant for landlords? Census tract 24033802901 scores 6.8/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #6,824 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,329 monthly, set against $53,789 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,869
Renter share46.8%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate17.5%
Median income$53,789
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
92
th percentile
Very High
Within state
85
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Seat Pleasant and the region
Centroid at 38.8937, -76.9034 · click any tract to drill in
Why Northeast Boundary scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Seat Pleasant
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
17.5% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,329 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Seat Pleasant
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Seat Pleasant
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Seat Pleasant
5.2
How Northeast Boundary compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 74%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 624Total filings over 4 yrs
- 24.96%Avg annual filing rate
- 34.0%Peak (2016)
- 200Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 85% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.1%Housing insecurity
- 16.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.2%Food insecurity
- 24.4%SNAP enrollment
- 13.8%Transit barriers
- 15.0%No health insurance
- 15.9%Frequent mental distress
- 32.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Northeast Boundary
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Seat Pleasant, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 25.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 81st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 24033802901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033802901?
Census tract 24033802901 in the Northeast Boundary neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24033802901?
Median gross rent is $1,329/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24033802901?
17.5% of residents in tract 24033802901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,941.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24033802901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 64th, minority 99th, housing 75th.
Q5
Is tract 24033802901 considered part of Northeast Boundary?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033802901 fall within Northeast Boundary (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033802901?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 624 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033802901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 24.96% of renter households, peaking at 34.0% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 24033802901 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 24033802901 compare to Seat Pleasant overall?
Tract 24033802901 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of Seat Pleasant at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Seat Pleasant; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related