Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Ardmore Eviction Risk: Lower , Glenarden

Tract 24033803601 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,894 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 5.7/10, tract 24033803601 in Ardmore in Glenarden ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,894 residents. That is riskier than about 65% of US census tracts.

19% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $114,957 a year. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 3% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,137
Renter share4.2%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$114,957

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Ardmore
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Glenarden
Moderate
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#179 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#1,188 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glenarden and the region

Centroid at 38.9398, -76.8472 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ardmore scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glenarden
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glenarden
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glenarden
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glenarden
4.4

How Ardmore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ardmore risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 803601Glenarden: 6.26.2Glenardenparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 16Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 4.34%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.5%Peak (2014)
  • 8Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338036012011: 2 filings (1.63/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (4.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ardmore. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ardmore

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glenarden, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and below the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 16 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 4.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.5% of renter households in 2014.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033803601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803601?

Census tract 24033803601 in the Ardmore neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803601?

2.0% of residents in tract 24033803601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,894.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 74th, minority 98th, housing 33th.
Q4

Is tract 24033803601 considered part of Ardmore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803601 fall within Ardmore (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 24033803601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.34% of renter households, peaking at 6.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 24033803601 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24033803601 compare to Glenarden overall?

Tract 24033803601 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Glenarden at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glenarden; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related