Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally

Hampshire Knolls Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chillum

Tract 24033805201 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 4,905 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Tract 24033805201 sits in the Hampshire Knolls area of Chillum eviction risk, MD, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.3/10. It is home to 4,905 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 10/10.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 45% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,375
Renter share65.2%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$90,788

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hampshire Knolls
Moderate
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Chillum
Very Low
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
High
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#454 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chillum and the region

Centroid at 38.9664, -76.9955 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hampshire Knolls scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chillum
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,675 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chillum
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chillum
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chillum
5.9

How Hampshire Knolls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hampshire Knolls risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.3This tracttract 8052016.1Chillumparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,139Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 62.68%Avg annual filing rate
  • 75.9%Peak (2011)
  • 353Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033805201
Filings dropped 47% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hampshire Knolls

31% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Prince George's County average of 45.6%. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.6/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.1/10.

This is renter territory: 65% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Against the Prince George's County average of 4.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points.

Adults with no health insurance runs 23.3% against 11.3% nationally. 10% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Housing insecurity runs 23.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Court records carry 2,139 eviction filings across 4 observed years. The worst year on record was 2011, when 75.9% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 62.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033805201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033805201?

Census tract 24033805201 in the Hampshire Knolls neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033805201?

Median gross rent is $1,675/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033805201?

9.7% of residents in tract 24033805201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,905.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033805201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 84th, minority 99th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 24033805201 considered part of Hampshire Knolls?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033805201 fall within Hampshire Knolls (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033805201?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,139 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033805201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 62.68% of renter households, peaking at 75.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033805201 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033805201 compare to Chillum overall?

Tract 24033805201 scores 6.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Chillum at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chillum eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chillum

Top eight tracts in Chillum ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related