Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Green Meadows Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chillum

Tract 24033805802 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 4,857 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 24033805802 (the Green Meadows neighborhood of Chillum, Maryland) comes in at 6.8/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 92% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,176 monthly, set against $101,250 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 18% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,228
Renter share27.0%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate7.0%
Median income$101,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Green Meadows
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Chillum
Very Low
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#532 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chillum and the region

Centroid at 38.9743, -76.9744 · click any tract to drill in

Why Green Meadows scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chillum
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
7.0% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,176 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chillum
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chillum
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chillum
5.9

How Green Meadows compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Green Meadows risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 805802Chillum: 6.46.4Chillumparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 754Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 59.80%Avg annual filing rate
  • 127.7%Peak (2016)
  • 327Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338058022011: 86 filings (22.45/100 renter HHs)2012: 86 filings (22.45/100 renter HHs)2014: 255 filings (66.58/100 renter HHs)2016: 327 filings (127.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 280% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Green Meadows

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chillum eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033805802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033805802?

Census tract 24033805802 in the Green Meadows neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033805802?

Median gross rent is $2,176/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033805802?

7.0% of residents in tract 24033805802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,857.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033805802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 52th, minority 98th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 24033805802 considered part of Green Meadows?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033805802 fall within Green Meadows (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033805802?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 754 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033805802 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 59.80% of renter households, peaking at 127.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033805802 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033805802 compare to Chillum overall?

Tract 24033805802 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Chillum at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chillum eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chillum

Top eight tracts in Chillum ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related