Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Teaticket Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 25001014700 ·
Barnstable County, MA · pop 3,870 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Teaticket
Tract 25001014700 covers Teaticket in Massachusetts. Home to 3,870 residents, it scores 5.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 57% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,009 a month against an average household income of $85,417 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 10%Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,742
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$85,417
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Teaticket
Moderate
Within county
55th percentile
#26 of 56 tracts In Barnstable County
Moderate
Within state
36th percentile
#1,033 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Low
National
19th percentile
#68,306 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Teaticket and the region
Centroid at 41.5623, -70.5737 · click any tract to drill in
Why Teaticket scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Teaticket
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,009 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Teaticket
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Teaticket
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Teaticket
4.3
How Teaticket compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
29%Socioeconomic
42%Household composition
20%Racial/ethnic minority
25%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.5%Housing insecurity
6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
10.2%Food insecurity
12.4%SNAP enrollment
6.3%Transit barriers
4.2%No health insurance
14.6%Frequent mental distress
32.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Teaticket
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Teaticket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Barnstable County average of 5.5 and below the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 32 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 4.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.8% of renter households in 2016.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 25001014700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25001014700?
Census tract 25001014700 in Teaticket scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25001014700?
Median gross rent is $2,009/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25001014700?
8.3% of residents in tract 25001014700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,870.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25001014700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 42th, minority 20th, housing 25th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25001014700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 32 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 25001014700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.28% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 25001014700 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 25001014700 compare to Teaticket overall?
Tract 25001014700 scores 2.4/10, lower than the parent city of Teaticket at 5.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Teaticket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.