Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally
Freeman Grove Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , North Adams
Tract 25003931100 ·
Berkshire County, MA · pop 1,713 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 5.4/10, tract 25003931100 in the Freeman Grove Historic District neighborhood of North Adams ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 1,713 residents. That is riskier than roughly 53% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,145 a month while the average household earns $78,421 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 8%Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units726
Renter share15.2%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$78,421
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Freeman Grove Historic District
Very Low
Within county
28th percentile
#29 of 40 tracts In Berkshire County
Low
Within state
49th percentile
#825 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Moderate
National
33th percentile
#56,660 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across North Adams and the region
Centroid at 42.7227, -73.1058 · click any tract to drill in
Why Freeman Grove Historic District scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Adams
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,145 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Adams
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Adams
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Adams
5.0
How Freeman Grove Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
24%Socioeconomic
41%Household composition
10%Racial/ethnic minority
28%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
17Total filings over 8 yrs
3.59%Avg annual filing rate
8.1%Peak (2010)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2007 to 2016
Filings dropped 50% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Freeman Grove Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.2%Housing insecurity
6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
10.6%Food insecurity
13.0%SNAP enrollment
6.6%Transit barriers
4.3%No health insurance
17.3%Frequent mental distress
30.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Freeman Grove Historic District
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Adams, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Berkshire County average of 5.8 and below the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 17 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 3.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.1% of renter households in 2010.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 25003931100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25003931100?
Census tract 25003931100 in the Freeman Grove Historic District neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25003931100?
Median gross rent is $1,145/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25003931100?
2.5% of residents in tract 25003931100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,713.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25003931100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 41th, minority 10th, housing 28th.
Q5
Is tract 25003931100 considered part of Freeman Grove Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25003931100 fall within Freeman Grove Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25003931100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 25003931100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.59% of renter households, peaking at 8.1% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 25003931100 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 25003931100 compare to North Adams overall?
Tract 25003931100 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of North Adams at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Adams; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.