Inman Square Eviction Risk: High , Cambridge
Tract 25017352800 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 1,921 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 25017352800 covers part of the Inman Square area of Cambridge, MA, and scores 8.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,921 residents. It sits 2.4 points above the Middlesex County average of 6.3.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Cambridge and the region
Centroid at 42.3718, -71.0963 · click any tract to drill in
Why Inman Square scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Inman Square compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 49Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.77%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.1%Peak (2016)
- 13Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.8Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Inman Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.2%Food insecurity
- 9.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.8%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 20.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Inman Square
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. This is renter territory: 68% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 49 evictions over 5 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally.
At $2,512 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Cambridge commands. The worst year on record was 2016, when 2.1% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Cambridge. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 1.8% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 25017352800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017352800?
What is the average rent in tract 25017352800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017352800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017352800?
Is tract 25017352800 considered part of Inman Square?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017352800?
Did eviction filings in tract 25017352800 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 25017352800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 25017352800 compare to Cambridge overall?
Was tract 25017352800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Cambridge
Top eight tracts in Cambridge ranked by composite eviction-risk score.