Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Charing Cross Eviction Risk: Lower , Bloomfield Hills
Tract 26125152000 · Oakland County, MI · pop 4,402 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 26125152000 sits in the Charing Cross area of Bloomfield Hills, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,557
Renter share11.3%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$200,318
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
26
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bloomfield Hills and the region
Centroid at 42.5814, -83.2464 · click any tract to drill in
Why Charing Cross scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bloomfield Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,250 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bloomfield Hills
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bloomfield Hills
3.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bloomfield Hills
5.0
How Charing Cross compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Charing Cross. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.3%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.5%Food insecurity
- 3.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 3.2%No health insurance
- 11.1%Frequent mental distress
- 22.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Charing Cross
The voucher gap is 135.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.5/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.
The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 5.5% against 17.8% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 4.3% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 1.0 points below the Oakland County average of 4.0. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Detroit. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125152000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125152000?
Census tract 26125152000 in the Charing Cross neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26125152000?
Median gross rent is $3,250/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125152000?
3.6% of residents in tract 26125152000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,402.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125152000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 41th, minority 28th, housing 45th.
Q5
Is tract 26125152000 considered part of Charing Cross?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125152000 fall within Charing Cross (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 26125152000 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 26125152000 compare to Bloomfield Hills overall?
Tract 26125152000 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Bloomfield Hills at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bloomfield Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 26125152000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related