Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
C.O. Renshaw Addition Eviction Risk: Lower , Rochester
Tract 26125191000 · Oakland County, MI · pop 1,722 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 26125191000 (the C.O. Renshaw Addition area of Rochester, Michigan) comes in at 5.1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 42% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 30% of renter households, a moderate level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,158 a month while the average household earns $100,000 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 38% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units822
Renter share38.2%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$100,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
38
th percentile
Low
Within state
10
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rochester and the region
Centroid at 42.6780, -83.1411 · click any tract to drill in
Why C.O. Renshaw Addition scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rochester
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,158 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
3.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
3.3
How C.O. Renshaw Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 3%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.4%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.6%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in C.O. Renshaw Addition
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rochester, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Oakland County average of 5.7 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125191000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125191000?
Census tract 26125191000 in the C.O. Renshaw Addition neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26125191000?
Median gross rent is $1,158/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125191000?
3.7% of residents in tract 26125191000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,722.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125191000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 4th, minority 25th, housing 19th.
Q5
Is tract 26125191000 considered part of C.O. Renshaw Addition?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125191000 fall within C.O. Renshaw Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 26125191000 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 26125191000 compare to Rochester overall?
Tract 26125191000 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rochester
Top eight tracts in Rochester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related