Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Oaks Eviction Risk: Lower , Andover

Tract 27003050208 · Anoka County, MN · pop 3,304 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 27003050208, home to 3,304 residents in Oaks in Andover, scores 4.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 29% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 28% of renter households, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,861 a month while the average household earns $104,632 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 6% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 5% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,111
Renter share6.5%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$104,632

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Oaks
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 tracts In Andover
Very High
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#53 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Moderate
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#1,184 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Andover and the region

Centroid at 45.2158, -93.3103 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oaks scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Andover
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,861 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Andover
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Andover
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Andover
3.7

How Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 050208Andover: 4.84.8Andoverparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 31Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 28.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 90.0%Peak (2009)
  • 6Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030502082009: 9 filings (90.03/100 renter HHs)2010: 8 filings (8.16/100 renter HHs)2011: 8 filings (8.99/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (6.74/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oaks

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Andover eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Anoka County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050208

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050208?

Census tract 27003050208 in the Oaks neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050208?

Median gross rent is $1,861/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050208?

6.7% of residents in tract 27003050208 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,304.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050208?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 56th, minority 30th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 27003050208 considered part of Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27003050208 fall within Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050208?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 31 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050208 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 28.48% of renter households, peaking at 90.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27003050208 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27003050208 compare to Andover overall?

Tract 27003050208 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Andover at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Andover eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Andover

Top eight tracts in Andover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related