Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Diamond Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Richfield

Tract 27053024700 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,094 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 27053024700 covers the Diamond Lake neighborhood of Richfield in Minnesota. Home to 3,094 residents, it scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #57,427 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

33% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,092 monthly, set against $114,213 in average yearly household income, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 11% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,255
Renter share15.8%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$114,213

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Diamond Lake
Very Low
Within parent city
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 11 tracts In Richfield
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#231 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#1,090 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richfield and the region

Centroid at 44.8826, -93.2660 · click any tract to drill in

Why Diamond Lake scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richfield
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,092 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richfield
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richfield
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richfield
4.4

How Diamond Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Diamond Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 024700Richfield: 5.15.1Richfieldparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 55Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.55%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.6%Peak (2010)
  • 6Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530247002009: 13 filings (7.18/100 renter HHs)2010: 16 filings (7.55/100 renter HHs)2011: 13 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (3.50/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (3.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 54% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 19Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.56×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (5.26× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Diamond Lake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Diamond Lake

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 55 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 5.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.6% of renter households in 2010.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053024700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053024700?

Census tract 27053024700 in the Diamond Lake neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053024700?

Median gross rent is $1,092/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053024700?

5.5% of residents in tract 27053024700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,094.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053024700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 47th, minority 55th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 27053024700 considered part of Diamond Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053024700 fall within Diamond Lake (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053024700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053024700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.55% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053024700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.56× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053024700 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053024700 compare to Richfield overall?

Tract 27053024700 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Richfield at 5.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richfield

Top eight tracts in Richfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related