Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally
Diamond Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Richfield
Tract 27053024700 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,094 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 27053024700 covers part of the Diamond Lake area of Richfield, MN, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,094 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.4/10.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,255
Renter share15.8%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$114,213
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Richfield and the region
Centroid at 44.8826, -93.2660 · click any tract to drill in
Why Diamond Lake scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Richfield
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,092 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richfield
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richfield
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richfield
4.4
How Diamond Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 33
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 47%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 39%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 55Total filings over 5 yrs
- 5.55%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.6%Peak (2010)
- 6Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 54% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 19Total filings 2020-21
- 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.56×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Diamond Lake. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 8.0%No health insurance
- 13.7%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Diamond Lake
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.5/10. Against Hennepin County at 43.1%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened.
It sits 1.4 points below the Hennepin County average of 5.1. Average gross rent is $1,092, 22% below the Richfield average. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 55 filings here across 5 tracked years.
Food insecurity runs 9.7% against 17.8% nationally. The worst year on record was 2010, when 7.6% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 5.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 27053024700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053024700?
Census tract 27053024700 in the Diamond Lake neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27053024700?
Median gross rent is $1,092/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27053024700?
5.5% of residents in tract 27053024700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,094.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27053024700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 47th, minority 55th, housing 39th.
Q5
Is tract 27053024700 considered part of Diamond Lake?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053024700 fall within Diamond Lake (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053024700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053024700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.55% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 27053024700 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.56× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 27053024700 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 27053024700 compare to Richfield overall?
Tract 27053024700 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Richfield at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Richfield
Top eight tracts in Richfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MN
27053024802
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · MN
Edinborough
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
27053024903
4.9
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
Windom
4.7
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
27053024801
4.7
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
27053024600
4.5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
Diamond Lake
4.5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MN
Armatage
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Related