Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills North Eviction Risk: Lower , Maple Grove

Tract 27053026711 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,701 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 27053026711 runs through the Rolling Hills North area of Maple Grove. With 3,701 residents, it scores 3.7/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 8% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 0% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,124 a month while the average household earns $100,799 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 7% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,509
Renter share7.1%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$100,799

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rolling Hills North
Moderate
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 16 tracts In Maple Grove
High
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#250 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#1,184 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Maple Grove and the region

Centroid at 45.0777, -93.4531 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills North scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Maple Grove
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,124 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Maple Grove
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Maple Grove
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Maple Grove
3.7

How Rolling Hills North compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Hills North risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 026711Maple Grove: 4.94.9Maple Groveparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 47Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 4.74%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2011)
  • 10Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530267112009: 9 filings (6.72/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (4.17/100 renter HHs)2011: 14 filings (5.60/100 renter HHs)2012: 8 filings (3.20/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 19Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.59×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (3.23× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (16.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills North

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Maple Grove eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 47 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.6% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053026711

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053026711?

Census tract 27053026711 in the Rolling Hills North neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053026711?

Median gross rent is $1,124/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053026711?

4.7% of residents in tract 27053026711 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,701.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053026711?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 21th, minority 18th, housing 8th.
Q5

Is tract 27053026711 considered part of Rolling Hills North?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053026711 fall within Rolling Hills North (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053026711?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 47 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053026711 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.74% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053026711 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.59× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053026711 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053026711 compare to Maple Grove overall?

Tract 27053026711 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Maple Grove at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Maple Grove eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Maple Grove

Top eight tracts in Maple Grove ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related