Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally

South Saint Anthony Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Paul

Tract 27123033200 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 3,404 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.6/10 for census tract 27123033200 reflects conditions in the South Saint Anthony Park neighborhood of St. Paul, Minnesota. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 47% of renter households, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,584 a month while the average household earns $60,781 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 74% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 39% Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units2,077
Renter share74.3%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$60,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In South Saint Anthony Park
Very Low
Within parent city
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 85 tracts In St. Paul
Elevated
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#177 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Paul and the region

Centroid at 44.9594, -93.1959 · click any tract to drill in

Why South Saint Anthony Park scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Paul
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,584 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Paul
7.5

How South Saint Anthony Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
South Saint Anthony Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 033200St. Paul: 6.66.6St. Paulparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 189Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2010)
  • 29Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230332002009: 25 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 40 filings (4.42/100 renter HHs)2011: 20 filings (2.14/100 renter HHs)2012: 21 filings (2.25/100 renter HHs)2013: 19 filings (2.03/100 renter HHs)2014: 35 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2015: 29 filings (3.10/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 314Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.28×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (1.42× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (2.10× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (4.57× baseline)2022-04-01: 10 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2022-06-01: 17 filings (11.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (4.44× baseline)2022-08-01: 15 filings (6.30× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (3.56× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (4.94× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (5.14× baseline)2023-04-01: 10 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (5.07× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (7.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (3.11× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (2.52× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (5.66× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2023-12-01: 9 filings (5.56× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (4.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (3.36× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (2.47× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (1.26× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (1.68× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 11 filings (9.82× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.23× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within South Saint Anthony Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in South Saint Anthony Park

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123033200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123033200?

Census tract 27123033200 in the South Saint Anthony Park neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123033200?

Median gross rent is $1,584/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123033200?

15.2% of residents in tract 27123033200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,404.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123033200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 35th, minority 51th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 27123033200 considered part of South Saint Anthony Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123033200 fall within South Saint Anthony Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123033200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 189 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123033200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.99% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123033200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.28× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123033200 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123033200 compare to St. Paul overall?

Tract 27123033200 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of St. Paul at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123033200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul

Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related