Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally
Miner Eviction Risk: Moderate , Sikeston
Tract 29201780600 ·
Scott County, MO · pop 3,942 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
With a score of 4.5/10, tract 29201780600 in Miner in Sikeston ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,942 residents. It lands near the 23rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $793 a month against an average household income of $51,976 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 32% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 24%Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,655
Renter share32.0%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate12.3%
Median income$51,976
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Miner
Moderate
Within parent city
20th percentile
#5 of 6 tracts In Sikeston
Low
Within county
70th percentile
#4 of 11 tracts In Scott County
Elevated
Within state
65th percentile
#581 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Sikeston and the region
Centroid at 36.9069, -89.5359 · click any tract to drill in
Why Miner scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sikeston
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.3% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$793 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sikeston
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sikeston
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sikeston
6.8
How Miner compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
67%Socioeconomic
67%Household composition
38%Racial/ethnic minority
90%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
135Total filings over 12 yrs
2.31%Avg annual filing rate
4.9%Peak (2010)
8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2016
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
15.8%Housing insecurity
11.1%Utility-shutoff threat
19.5%Food insecurity
16.5%SNAP enrollment
10.7%Transit barriers
11.5%No health insurance
19.2%Frequent mental distress
42.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Miner
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sikeston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Scott County average of 4.5 and in line with the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 15.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 29201780600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29201780600?
Census tract 29201780600 in the Miner neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 29201780600?
Median gross rent is $793/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 29201780600?
12.3% of residents in tract 29201780600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,942.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 29201780600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 67th, minority 38th, housing 90th.
Q5
Is tract 29201780600 considered part of Miner?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29201780600 fall within Miner (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29201780600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 29201780600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.31% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 29201780600 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 29201780600 compare to Sikeston overall?
Tract 29201780600 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Sikeston at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sikeston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Sikeston
Top eight tracts in Sikeston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.