Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Laurel Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Four Corners

Tract 30031000502 · Gallatin County, MT · pop 8,119 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

The Laurel Glen neighborhood of Four Corners is where census tract 30031000502 sits, home to 8,119 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. It lands near the 12th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

40% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,930 a month while the average household earns $125,068 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 12% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,957
Renter share19.7%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$125,068

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Laurel Glen
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Four Corners
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 26 tracts In Gallatin County
Very Low
Within state
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#318 of 319 tracts In Montana
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Four Corners and the region

Centroid at 45.6927, -111.1273 · click any tract to drill in

Why Laurel Glen scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Four Corners
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,930 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Four Corners
2.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Four Corners
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Four Corners
2.9

How Laurel Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Laurel Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 000502Four Corners: 1.71.7Four Cornersparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 0.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.4%Peak (2000)
  • 1Filings in 2001 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2002
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 300310005022000: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2001: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Laurel Glen

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Four Corners eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Gallatin County average of 4.7 and in line with the Montana statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 9th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 30031000502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30031000502?

Census tract 30031000502 in the Laurel Glen neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30031000502?

Median gross rent is $1,930/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30031000502?

3.0% of residents in tract 30031000502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,119.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30031000502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 8th, minority 6th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 30031000502 considered part of Laurel Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30031000502 fall within Laurel Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 30031000502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 30031000502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.42% of renter households, peaking at 0.4% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 30031000502 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 30031000502 compare to Four Corners overall?

Tract 30031000502 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Four Corners at 1.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Four Corners eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Four Corners

Top eight tracts in Four Corners ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related