Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area Eviction Risk: Lower , Mount Charleston
Tract 32003007500 ·
Clark, NV · pop 1,399 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Tract 32003007500 covers the Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area area of Mount Charleston in Nevada. Home to 1,399 residents, it scores 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 28% of US census tracts.
21% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,159 a month while the average household earns $120,300 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 14%Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units494
Renter share17.6%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$120,300
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Mount Charleston
Moderate
Within county
2th percentile
#527 of 535 tracts In Clark
Very Low
Within state
3th percentile
#757 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mount Charleston and the region
Centroid at 36.2561, -115.6098 · click any tract to drill in
Why Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Charleston
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,159 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Charleston
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Charleston
3.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Charleston
2.6
How Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
34%Socioeconomic
20%Household composition
48%Racial/ethnic minority
30%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
16Total filings 2020-21
0.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
0.71×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Las Vegas, NV as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.3%Housing insecurity
6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
10.3%Food insecurity
9.4%SNAP enrollment
6.5%Transit barriers
8.0%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
32.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mount Charleston, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clark County average of 6.0 and below the Nevada statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.71x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 32003007500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32003007500?
Census tract 32003007500 in the Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 32003007500?
Median gross rent is $2,159/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 32003007500?
5.1% of residents in tract 32003007500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,399.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 32003007500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 20th, minority 48th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 32003007500 considered part of Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32003007500 fall within Kyle Canyon Summer Home Area (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 32003007500 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.71× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Las Vegas eviction risk, NV), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 32003007500 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 32003007500 compare to Mount Charleston overall?
Tract 32003007500 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Mount Charleston at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Charleston; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.