Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally
Epping Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 33015059000 · Rockingham County, NH · pop 7,180 · 28% of tract blocks fall in Epping
Tract 33015059000 sits in Epping eviction risk, NH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. It is home to 7,180 residents. Average gross rent is $2,019, 54% above the Epping average.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units3,023
Renter share14.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$101,354
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
National
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Epping and the region
Centroid at 43.0510, -71.0883 · click any tract to drill in
Why Epping scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Epping
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$2,019 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Epping
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Epping
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Epping
5.8
How Epping compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 29%Household composition
- 11%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.9%Food insecurity
- 6.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.7%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 24.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Epping
Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against Rockingham County at 45.1%, 56% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.7/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.8/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 9.9% against 17.8% nationally.
Nationally it ranks #42,813 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.3/10. It tracks the Rockingham County average of 4.3 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 33015059000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33015059000?
Census tract 33015059000 in Epping scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 33015059000?
Median gross rent is $2,019/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 33015059000?
6.7% of residents in tract 33015059000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,180.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 33015059000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 29th, minority 11th, housing 42th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 33015059000 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 33015059000 compare to Epping overall?
Tract 33015059000 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Epping at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Epping eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related