Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
University Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Pomona
Tract 34001010403 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 8,573 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 34001010403, home to 8,573 residents in University Park in Pomona, scores 6.4/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #12,762 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 41% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $862 monthly, set against $100,706 in average yearly household income, roughly 10% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,297
Renter share15.5%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$100,706
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
32
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pomona and the region
Centroid at 39.4680, -74.5552 · click any tract to drill in
Why University Park scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pomona
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$862 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pomona
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pomona
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pomona
6.3
How University Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 97%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 142Total filings over 6 yrs
- 5.65%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.0%Peak (2018)
- 35Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 84% over the past 6 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.3%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.8%Transit barriers
- 11.0%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 26.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in University Park
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pomona, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Atlantic County average of 6.7 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 142 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 5.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.0% of renter households in 2018.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34001010403
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001010403?
Census tract 34001010403 in the University Park neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34001010403?
Median gross rent is $862/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34001010403?
5.2% of residents in tract 34001010403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,573.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34001010403?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 93th, minority 77th, housing 97th.
Q5
Is tract 34001010403 considered part of University Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34001010403 fall within University Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001010403?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 142 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34001010403 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.65% of renter households, peaking at 9.0% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34001010403 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34001010403 compare to Pomona overall?
Tract 34001010403 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Pomona at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pomona; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related