Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Folsom Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 34001011201 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 1,761

With a score of $1/10, tract 34001011201 in Folsom ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 1,761 residents. On the national scale it ranks #4,710 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 49% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,701 a month against an average household income of $112,857 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 4% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units662
Renter share7.7%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$112,857

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Folsom
Moderate
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 73 tracts In Atlantic County
Very Low
Within state
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#1,483 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Folsom and the region

Centroid at 39.5967, -74.8432 · click any tract to drill in

Why Folsom scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Folsom
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,701 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Folsom
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Folsom
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Folsom
6.6

How Folsom compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Folsom risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 011201Folsom: 7.77.7Folsomparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 27Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 11.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.8%Peak (2013)
  • 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340010112012013: 6 filings (11.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (5.88/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (11.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 6 filings (13.33/100 renter HHs)2018: 6 filings (13.33/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Folsom

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Folsom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Atlantic County average of 6.7 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 27 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 11.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.8% of renter households in 2013.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34001011201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001011201?

Census tract 34001011201 in Folsom scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34001011201?

Median gross rent is $1,701/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34001011201?

6.3% of residents in tract 34001011201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,761.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34001011201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 42th, minority 23th, housing 7th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001011201?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 27 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34001011201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.21% of renter households, peaking at 11.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34001011201 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34001011201 compare to Folsom overall?

Tract 34001011201 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Folsom at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Folsom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related