Census Tract · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 34003031100 Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34003031100 ·
Bergen County, NJ · pop 6,621
With a score of 6.4/10, tract 34003031100 in Bergen County, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%Stable renters 35%Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units2,706
Renter share56.8%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$110,636
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
59th percentile
#83 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Elevated
Within state
61th percentile
#849 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
National
81th percentile
#16,032 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bergen County and the region
Centroid at 40.7940, -74.1053 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 34003031100 scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,977 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 34003031100 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
28%Socioeconomic
8%Household composition
64%Racial/ethnic minority
44%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
3%Grade C
8%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.9%Housing insecurity
6.3%Utility-shutoff threat
12.2%Food insecurity
6.7%SNAP enrollment
6.6%Transit barriers
11.2%No health insurance
15.8%Frequent mental distress
21.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 34003031100
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 7.9/10. 39% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Bergen County average of 46.6%.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.3/10. SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally. Court records carry 372 eviction filings across 5 observed years.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 9.0% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 6.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 81% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003031100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003031100?
Census tract 34003031100 in Bergen County scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34003031100?
Median gross rent is $1,977/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003031100?
9.1% of residents in tract 34003031100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,621.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003031100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 8th, minority 64th, housing 44th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003031100?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 372 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34003031100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.43% of renter households, peaking at 9.0% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34003031100 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
Was tract 34003031100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.