Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Mile Hollow Eviction Risk: Lower , Bordentown
Tract 34005701700 ·
Burlington County, NJ · pop 3,989 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Here is how census tract 34005701700, in the Mile Hollow neighborhood of Bordentown, looks to a landlord: a 6.6/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 3,989. It lands near the 89th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
44% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,468 monthly, set against $91,208 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 48% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%Stable renters 27%Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,830
Renter share48.2%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate5.8%
Median income$91,208
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Mile Hollow
Very High
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Bordentown
Moderate
Within county
53th percentile
#56 of 117 tracts In Burlington County
Moderate
Within state
45th percentile
#1,202 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bordentown and the region
Centroid at 40.1497, -74.7077 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mile Hollow scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bordentown
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.8% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,468 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bordentown
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bordentown
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bordentown
4.4
How Mile Hollow compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
26%Socioeconomic
27%Household composition
41%Racial/ethnic minority
30%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
267Total filings over 6 yrs
5.18%Avg annual filing rate
6.3%Peak (2013)
40Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2013 to 2018
Filings dropped 31% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mile Hollow. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.1%Housing insecurity
5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
9.6%Food insecurity
5.7%SNAP enrollment
6.0%Transit barriers
7.8%No health insurance
15.3%Frequent mental distress
24.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mile Hollow
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bordentown, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Burlington County average of 6.5 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 267 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 5.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.3% of renter households in 2013.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34005701700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34005701700?
Census tract 34005701700 in the Mile Hollow neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34005701700?
Median gross rent is $1,468/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34005701700?
5.8% of residents in tract 34005701700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,989.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34005701700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 27th, minority 41th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 34005701700 considered part of Mile Hollow?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34005701700 fall within Mile Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34005701700?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 267 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34005701700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.18% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34005701700 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34005701700 compare to Bordentown overall?
Tract 34005701700 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Bordentown at 7.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bordentown; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.