Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,882 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 34007602901 Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 34007602901 · Camden County, NJ · pop 4,840

Census tract 34007602901 covers part of Camden County, NJ, and scores 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,840. Against Camden County at 48.5%, 14% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 6% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units2,136
Renter share7.1%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$106,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#90 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#1,533 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camden County and the region

Centroid at 39.9671, -75.0255 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 34007602901 scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,034 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 34007602901 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 34007602901 risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.7This tracttract 6029015.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 118Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 9.60%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.2%Peak (2018)
  • 30Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007602901
Filings climbed 30% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 34007602901

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2/10. The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points. The filing record is not thin: 118 evictions over 6 years of observation. SNAP participation runs 7.4% against 15.2% nationally.

The voucher gap is 12.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Filings peaked in 2018 at 12.2% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 9.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 55th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007602901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007602901?

Census tract 34007602901 in Camden County scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007602901?

Median gross rent is $2,034/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 14% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007602901?

8.0% of residents in tract 34007602901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,840.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007602901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 53th, minority 68th, housing 18th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007602901?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 118 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007602901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.60% of renter households, peaking at 12.2% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34007602901 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

Was tract 34007602901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related