Census Tract · Ranked #6,432 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High

Tract 34007603202 · Camden County, NJ · pop 2,608 · 95% of tract blocks fall in Golden Triangle

Here is how census tract 34007603202, in Golden Triangle, looks to a landlord: a 6.7/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 2,608. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,488 a month while the average household earns $111,563 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

8.5

High

Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 32% Owners 53%

Tract context

Occupied units1,389

Renter share47.3%

SVI overall0.31

Poverty rate10.0%

Median income$111,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Golden Triangle and the region

Centroid at 39.9284, -75.0446 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Triangle scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Golden Triangle

7.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.7

State political climate

New Jersey legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

10.0% poverty · this tract

2.5

Supply constraint

$2,488 rent vs county FMR

8.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Golden Triangle

5.4

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.4

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Golden Triangle

7.9

Housing court bias

Inherited from Golden Triangle

5.0

How Golden Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

21%Socioeconomic
57%Household composition
40%Racial/ethnic minority
34%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
14%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

10.1%Housing insecurity
6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
11.7%Food insecurity
7.2%SNAP enrollment
6.3%Transit barriers
8.3%No health insurance
14.2%Frequent mental distress
25.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Golden Triangle, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007603202

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603202?

Census tract 34007603202 in Golden Triangle scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 34007603202?

Median gross rent is $2,488/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603202?

10.0% of residents in tract 34007603202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,608.

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 57th, minority 40th, housing 34th.

What share of households in tract 34007603202 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 34007603202 compare to Golden Triangle overall?

Tract 34007603202 scores 8.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Golden Triangle at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Triangle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 34007603202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Golden Triangle

Top eight tracts in Golden Triangle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.