Census Tract · Ranked #4,855 of 84,120 nationally

Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: High

Tract 34007603700 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,649 · 3% of tract blocks fall in Golden Triangle

Tract 34007603700 covers Golden Triangle in Camden County in New Jersey. Home to 3,649 residents, it scores 6.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,397 monthly, set against $80,733 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

High

Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 17% Owners 63%

Tract context

Occupied units1,573

Renter share36.3%

SVI overall0.56

Poverty rate7.9%

Median income$80,733

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Golden Triangle and the region

Centroid at 39.9102, -75.0165 · click any tract to drill in

Why Golden Triangle scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Golden Triangle

7.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

6.7

State political climate

New Jersey legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

7.9% poverty · this tract

2.0

Supply constraint

$1,397 rent vs county FMR

2.8

Rent control risk

Inherited from Golden Triangle

5.4

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.4

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Golden Triangle

7.9

Housing court bias

Inherited from Golden Triangle

5.0

How Golden Triangle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 56

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

55%Socioeconomic
56%Household composition
54%Racial/ethnic minority
50%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
23%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

542Total filings over 6 yrs
16.81%Avg annual filing rate
18.7%Peak (2014)
75Filings in 2018 (latest validated)

Filings by year 2013 to 2018

Filings dropped 17% over the past 6 months.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

10.7%Housing insecurity
6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
11.7%Food insecurity
6.9%SNAP enrollment
6.5%Transit barriers
9.4%No health insurance
15.3%Frequent mental distress
23.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Golden Triangle, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 542 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 16.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.7% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007603700

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603700?

Census tract 34007603700 in Golden Triangle scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 34007603700?

Median gross rent is $1,397/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603700?

7.9% of residents in tract 34007603700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,649.

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 56th, minority 54th, housing 50th.

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603700?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 542 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007603700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.81% of renter households, peaking at 18.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

What share of households in tract 34007603700 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 34007603700 compare to Golden Triangle overall?

Tract 34007603700 scores 9/10, higher than the parent city of Golden Triangle at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Triangle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 34007603700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Golden Triangle

Top eight tracts in Golden Triangle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.