Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Whitman Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Collingswood
Tract 34007604400 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,367 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
34007604400 is a census tract in the Whitman Park area of Collingswood, NJ. It scores 5/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,367 residents. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Camden County average of 48.5%.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,366
Renter share15.3%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate5.9%
Median income$131,719
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
39
th percentile
Low
Within state
36
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Collingswood and the region
Centroid at 39.9136, -75.0747 · click any tract to drill in
Why Whitman Park scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Collingswood
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.9% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,234 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Collingswood
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Collingswood
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Collingswood
6.4
How Whitman Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 27%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 5%Grade A
- 67%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 90Total filings over 6 yrs
- 5.32%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.9%Peak (2013)
- 19Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Whitman Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.1%Food insecurity
- 4.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.5%Transit barriers
- 5.8%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 20.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Whitman Park
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.0% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 7.1% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,234, 17% below the Collingswood average.
Court records carry 90 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 7.9% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 5.3% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007604400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007604400?
Census tract 34007604400 in the Whitman Park neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007604400?
Median gross rent is $1,234/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007604400?
5.9% of residents in tract 34007604400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,367.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007604400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 44th, minority 24th, housing 27th.
Q5
Is tract 34007604400 considered part of Whitman Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007604400 fall within Whitman Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007604400?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 90 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007604400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.32% of renter households, peaking at 7.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007604400 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007604400 compare to Collingswood overall?
Tract 34007604400 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of Collingswood at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Collingswood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007604400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Collingswood
Top eight tracts in Collingswood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related