Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Audubon Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34007605700 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,431
Census tract 34007605700 runs through Audubon. With 3,431 residents, it scores 5.9/10 for landlords. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,142 a month while the average household earns $109,118 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,314
Renter share24.2%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate2.1%
Median income$109,118
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
11
th percentile
Very Low
National
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Audubon and the region
Centroid at 39.8933, -75.0638 · click any tract to drill in
Why Audubon scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Audubon
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,142 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Audubon
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Audubon
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Audubon
3.1
How Audubon compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 11%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 4%Grade A
- 88%Grade B
- 6%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 183Total filings over 6 yrs
- 8.80%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.3%Peak (2017)
- 20Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 46% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.9%Food insecurity
- 5.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 6.8%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 22.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Audubon
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Audubon, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Camden County average of 6.8 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007605700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007605700?
Census tract 34007605700 in Audubon scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007605700?
Median gross rent is $1,142/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007605700?
2.1% of residents in tract 34007605700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,431.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007605700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 41th, minority 11th, housing 26th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007605700?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 183 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007605700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.80% of renter households, peaking at 11.3% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007605700 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007605700 compare to Audubon overall?
Tract 34007605700 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Audubon at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Audubon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007605700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Audubon
Top eight tracts in Audubon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related