Census Tract · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 34015502202 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34015502202 ·
Gloucester County, NJ · pop 2,843
34015502202 is a census tract in Gloucester County, NJ. It scores 4.8/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs 63% here against 45.2% across Gloucester County.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%Stable renters 15%Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,301
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$106,406
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
52th percentile
#34 of 69 tracts In Gloucester County
Moderate
Within state
32th percentile
#1,472 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
58th percentile
#35,669 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gloucester County and the region
Centroid at 39.7326, -75.3523 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 34015502202 scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$2,172 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 34015502202 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.8%Housing insecurity
5.9%Utility-shutoff threat
10.6%Food insecurity
6.4%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
7.2%No health insurance
14.9%Frequent mental distress
25.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 34015502202
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9/10. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 20.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.5/10. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally.
On the high side, supply constraint reads 7.1/10. Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.6/10. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34015502202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34015502202?
Census tract 34015502202 in Gloucester County scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34015502202?
Median gross rent is $2,172/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34015502202?
10.1% of residents in tract 34015502202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,843.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34015502202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 92th, minority 52th, housing 29th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 34015502202 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.