Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Green and White Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Matawan

Tract 34025803000 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 5,779 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 6.1/10, tract 34025803000 in the Green and White Village neighborhood of Matawan ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 5,779 residents. On the national scale it ranks #19,030 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

34% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,477 a month against an average household income of $127,727 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 38% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 25% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units2,268
Renter share37.7%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate12.7%
Median income$127,727

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Green and White Village
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Matawan
Very High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
High
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#849 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Matawan and the region

Centroid at 40.4076, -74.2422 · click any tract to drill in

Why Green and White Village scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Matawan
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,477 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Matawan
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Matawan
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Matawan
4.7

How Green and White Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Green and White Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 803000Matawan: 7.37.3Matawanparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 268Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 21.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.5%Peak (2018)
  • 145Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Green and White Village

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Matawan, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 268 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 21.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.5% of renter households in 2018.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025803000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803000?

Census tract 34025803000 in the Green and White Village neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025803000?

Median gross rent is $1,477/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803000?

12.7% of residents in tract 34025803000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,779.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 33th, minority 42th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 34025803000 considered part of Green and White Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025803000 fall within Green and White Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025803000?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 268 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025803000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 21.42% of renter households, peaking at 23.5% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34025803000 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34025803000 compare to Matawan overall?

Tract 34025803000 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Matawan at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Matawan; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Matawan

Top eight tracts in Matawan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related