Cedar Falls Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Singac
Tract 34031154006 · Passaic County, NJ · pop 5,028 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
34031154006 is a census tract in the Cedar Falls Manor area of Singac, NJ. It scores 3.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,028. 32% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Passaic County average of 49.2%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Singac and the region
Centroid at 40.8825, -74.2316 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedar Falls Manor scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cedar Falls Manor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 32%Socioeconomic
- 10%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 16%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 3%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cedar Falls Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.6%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 9.4%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 24.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cedar Falls Manor
It sits 3.5 points below the Passaic County average of 6.7. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.1/10.
20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.8/10.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8/10. SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Essex Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.8 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34031154006
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34031154006?
What is the average rent in tract 34031154006?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34031154006?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34031154006?
Is tract 34031154006 considered part of Cedar Falls Manor?
What share of households in tract 34031154006 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34031154006 compare to Singac overall?
Was tract 34031154006 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Singac
Top eight tracts in Singac ranked by composite eviction-risk score.