Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Cedar Falls Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Singac

Tract 34031154006 · Passaic County, NJ · pop 5,028 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

34031154006 is a census tract in the Cedar Falls Manor area of Singac, NJ. It scores 3.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,028. 32% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Passaic County average of 49.2%.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 20% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units2,248
Renter share29.3%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$115,227

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Cedar Falls Manor
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Singac
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#110 of 120 tracts In Passaic County
Very Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#2,042 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Singac and the region

Centroid at 40.8825, -74.2316 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedar Falls Manor scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Singac
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,917 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Singac
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Singac
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Singac
3.6

How Cedar Falls Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedar Falls Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 154006Singac: 4.64.6Singacparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 6.06.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cedar Falls Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedar Falls Manor

It sits 3.5 points below the Passaic County average of 6.7. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.1/10.

20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.8/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8/10. SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Essex Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.8 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34031154006

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34031154006?

Census tract 34031154006 in the Cedar Falls Manor neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34031154006?

Median gross rent is $1,917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34031154006?

7.1% of residents in tract 34031154006 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,028.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34031154006?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 10th, minority 51th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 34031154006 considered part of Cedar Falls Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34031154006 fall within Cedar Falls Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 34031154006 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34031154006 compare to Singac overall?

Tract 34031154006 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Singac at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Singac; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34031154006 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Singac

Top eight tracts in Singac ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related