Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Great Meadows Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 34041031301 · Warren County, NJ · pop 5,479 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Great Meadows

With a score of 3.2/10, tract 34041031301 in Great Meadows, NJ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,479 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is tenant-organizing strength at 1/10.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 11% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units2,404
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$101,282

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Great Meadows
Moderate
Within county
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#18 of 23 tracts In Warren County
Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#2,042 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Great Meadows and the region

Centroid at 40.8800, -74.8763 · click any tract to drill in

Why Great Meadows scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Meadows
4.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,596 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Meadows
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Meadows
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Meadows
4.9

How Great Meadows compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Great Meadows risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 0313013.7Great Meadowsparent city5.0Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 140Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 4.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.8%Peak (2013)
  • 12Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34041031301
Filings dropped 79% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Great Meadows

Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.8/10.

It sits 1.8 points below the Warren County average of 5.0. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

SNAP participation runs 4.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.8% against 17.8% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 140 evictions over 6 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2013, when 10.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 19% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 3.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.8 points cooler.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 34041031301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34041031301?

Census tract 34041031301 in Great Meadows scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34041031301?

Median gross rent is $1,596/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34041031301?

3.6% of residents in tract 34041031301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,479.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34041031301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 20th, minority 27th, housing 36th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34041031301?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 140 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34041031301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.40% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34041031301 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34041031301 compare to Great Meadows overall?

Tract 34041031301 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Great Meadows at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Meadows; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related