Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Albuquerque

Tract 35001000107 · Bernalillo County, NM · pop 2,535 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

In Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills in Albuquerque, census tract 35001000107 scores 6.4/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 85th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

69% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 46% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $917 a month while the average household earns $90,255 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 28% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 9% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,291
Renter share27.7%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate19.2%
Median income$90,255

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills
Very High
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 149 tracts In Albuquerque
Moderate
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 176 tracts In Bernalillo County
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#360 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Albuquerque and the region

Centroid at 35.1255, -106.4851 · click any tract to drill in

Why Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Albuquerque
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
19.2% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$917 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Albuquerque
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.0

How Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 000107Albuquerque: 4.24.2Albuquerqueparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 769Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 17.12%Avg annual filing rate
  • 39.0%Peak (2014)
  • 98Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 350010001072000: 31 filings (10.99/100 renter HHs)2001: 18 filings (6.38/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)2003: 8 filings (2.84/100 renter HHs)2004: 7 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)2005: 53 filings (13.73/100 renter HHs)2006: 33 filings (8.55/100 renter HHs)2007: 48 filings (12.44/100 renter HHs)2008: 93 filings (24.09/100 renter HHs)2009: 47 filings (12.18/100 renter HHs)2010: 89 filings (27.22/100 renter HHs)2011: 80 filings (31.87/100 renter HHs)2012: 80 filings (31.87/100 renter HHs)2013: 75 filings (29.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 98 filings (39.04/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 216% over the past 15 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 155Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.25×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 14 filings (1.56× baseline)2020-03-01: 10 filings (1.76× baseline)2020-04-01: 5 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 17 filings (3.19× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Albuquerque, NM as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bernalillo County average of 6.1 and above the New Mexico statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.25x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 35001000107

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35001000107?

Census tract 35001000107 in the Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 35001000107?

Median gross rent is $917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 35001000107?

19.2% of residents in tract 35001000107 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,535.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 35001000107?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 14th, minority 46th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 35001000107 considered part of Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 35001000107 fall within Casa Grande/South Glenwood Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 35001000107?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 769 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 35001000107 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 17.12% of renter households, peaking at 39.0% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 35001000107 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.25× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Albuquerque eviction risk, NM), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 35001000107 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 35001000107 compare to Albuquerque overall?

Tract 35001000107 scores 4.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Albuquerque at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Albuquerque

Top eight tracts in Albuquerque ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related