Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Tanoan Eviction Risk: Lower , Albuquerque

Tract 35001003728 · Bernalillo County, NM · pop 4,498 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

How risky is Tanoan in Albuquerque for landlords? Census tract 35001003728 scores 5.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 60% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,197 monthly, set against $65,772 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 60% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 39% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,225
Renter share60.4%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$65,772

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Tanoan
Elevated
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#116 of 149 tracts In Albuquerque
Low
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 176 tracts In Bernalillo County
Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#470 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Albuquerque and the region

Centroid at 35.1409, -106.5250 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanoan scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Albuquerque
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,197 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Albuquerque
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.0

How Tanoan compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanoan risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 003728Albuquerque: 4.24.2Albuquerqueparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,056Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 11.29%Avg annual filing rate
  • 17.2%Peak (2010)
  • 84Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 350010037282000: 91 filings (7.91/100 renter HHs)2001: 74 filings (6.43/100 renter HHs)2002: 83 filings (7.21/100 renter HHs)2003: 137 filings (11.90/100 renter HHs)2004: 141 filings (12.25/100 renter HHs)2005: 129 filings (9.56/100 renter HHs)2006: 86 filings (6.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 132 filings (9.79/100 renter HHs)2008: 169 filings (12.53/100 renter HHs)2009: 182 filings (13.49/100 renter HHs)2010: 210 filings (17.17/100 renter HHs)2011: 195 filings (17.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 208 filings (18.31/100 renter HHs)2013: 135 filings (11.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 84 filings (7.39/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 602Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.20×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-02-01: 8 filings (1.41× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-07-01: 15 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-11-01: 13 filings (1.77× baseline)2022-12-01: 10 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-01-01: 15 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (1.76× baseline)2023-03-01: 11 filings (1.65× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 17 filings (2.69× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 18 filings (2.25× baseline)2023-08-01: 19 filings (2.28× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (1.32× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (1.64× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (1.64× baseline)2023-12-01: 16 filings (2.18× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 15 filings (2.65× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (1.35× baseline)2024-04-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-06-01: 14 filings (2.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 17 filings (2.04× baseline)2024-09-01: 10 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 15 filings (2.05× baseline)2024-11-01: 14 filings (1.91× baseline)2024-12-01: 17 filings (2.32× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-02-01: 16 filings (2.82× baseline)2025-03-01: 11 filings (1.65× baseline)2025-04-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 9 filings (1.42× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 16 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-09-01: 10 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-10-01: 8 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-11-01: 18 filings (2.46× baseline)2025-12-01: 13 filings (1.77× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Albuquerque, NM as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanoan. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanoan

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Bernalillo County average of 6.1 and in line with the New Mexico statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,056 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 11.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.2% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 35001003728

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35001003728?

Census tract 35001003728 in the Tanoan neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 35001003728?

Median gross rent is $1,197/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 35001003728?

3.5% of residents in tract 35001003728 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,498.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 35001003728?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 17th, minority 57th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 35001003728 considered part of Tanoan?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 35001003728 fall within Tanoan (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 35001003728?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,056 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 35001003728 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.29% of renter households, peaking at 17.2% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 35001003728 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.20× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Albuquerque eviction risk, NM), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 35001003728 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 35001003728 compare to Albuquerque overall?

Tract 35001003728 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Albuquerque at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Albuquerque

Top eight tracts in Albuquerque ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related