Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Tano Road Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 35049010204 ·
Santa Fe County, NM · pop 2,038 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Tano Road
Census tract 35049010204 covers part of Tano Road, NM, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,038 residents. 44% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 3%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,034
Renter share4.6%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate9.3%
Median income$167,394
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Tano Road
Moderate
Within county
13th percentile
#50 of 57 tracts In Santa Fe County
Very Low
Within state
22th percentile
#478 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tano Road and the region
Centroid at 35.7916, -106.0568 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tano Road scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tano Road
7.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.7
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
9.3% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$2,339 rent vs county FMR
9.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tano Road
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tano Road
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tano Road
6.9
How Tano Road compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 13
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
4.1%Housing insecurity
3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
5.0%Food insecurity
3.7%SNAP enrollment
3.3%Transit barriers
4.3%No health insurance
8.9%Frequent mental distress
24.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tano Road
The voucher gap is 43.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9/10.
On the high side, local political climate reads 7.9/10. SNAP participation runs 3.7% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.2 points below the Santa Fe County average of 4.2.
Against Santa Fe County at 39.5%, 44% of renters here are cost-burdened. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $167,394, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the NM average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 35049010204
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35049010204?
Census tract 35049010204 in Tano Road scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 35049010204?
Median gross rent is $2,339/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 35049010204?
9.3% of residents in tract 35049010204 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,038.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 35049010204?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 44th, minority 42th, housing 18th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 35049010204 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 35049010204 compare to Tano Road overall?
Tract 35049010204 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tano Road at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tano Road; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.