Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,733 of 84,120 nationally

Arnett Eviction Risk: Elevated , Rochester

Tract 36055006300 · Monroe County, NY · pop 3,190 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 36055006300 sits in the Arnett area of Rochester eviction risk, New York eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.6/10. It lands near the 88th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,218 monthly, set against $65,167 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 20% Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,118
Renter share45.9%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate16.9%
Median income$65,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Arnett
Moderate
Within parent city
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#64 of 84 tracts In Rochester
Low
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Elevated
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#1,451 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rochester and the region

Centroid at 43.1446, -77.6422 · click any tract to drill in

Why Arnett scores 7.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
16.9% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$1,218 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
7.0

How Arnett compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Arnett risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.37.3This tracttract 006300Rochester: 9.19.1Rochesterparent cityCounty: 5.95.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Arnett

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rochester eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Monroe County average of 6.1 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

In CDC survey modeling, about 21.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055006300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055006300?

Census tract 36055006300 in the Arnett neighborhood scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055006300?

Median gross rent is $1,218/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055006300?

16.9% of residents in tract 36055006300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,190.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055006300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 94th, minority 88th, housing 51th.
Q5

Is tract 36055006300 considered part of Arnett?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055006300 fall within Arnett (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055006300 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055006300 compare to Rochester overall?

Tract 36055006300 scores 7.3/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055006300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rochester

Top eight tracts in Rochester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related