Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 36055014400 Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 36055014400 · Monroe County, NY · pop 4,718

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 36055014400 in Monroe County, NY reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,718. Against Monroe County at 46.4%, 28% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 9% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,922
Renter share11.9%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate8.7%
Median income$86,705

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#136 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#4,137 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
National
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#19,618 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Monroe County and the region

Centroid at 43.1383, -77.6885 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 36055014400 scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
8.7% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,413 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
State baseline
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 36055014400 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 36055014400 risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 0144007.2Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 36055014400

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 2.2/10. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Monroe County average of 7.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points.

On the high side, state political climate reads 7.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.3/10.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point.

Average gross rent runs $1,413 a month. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $86,705.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055014400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055014400?

Census tract 36055014400 in Monroe County scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055014400?

Median gross rent is $1,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055014400?

8.7% of residents in tract 36055014400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,718.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055014400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 49th, minority 44th, housing 77th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 36055014400 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

Was tract 36055014400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related