Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #20,889 of 84,120 nationally

High Falls Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 36111952901 · Ulster County, NY · pop 2,820 · 8% of tract blocks fall in High Falls

In High Falls, census tract 36111952901 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 38th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,203 a month against an average household income of $105,042 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 16% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,211
Renter share21.2%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$105,042

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In High Falls
Moderate
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 50 tracts In Ulster County
Moderate
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#3,543 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
National
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#20,889 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across High Falls and the region

Centroid at 41.8737, -74.1274 · click any tract to drill in

Why High Falls scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from High Falls
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$1,203 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from High Falls
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from High Falls
3.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from High Falls
4.0

How High Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
High Falls risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.35.3This tracttract 952901High Falls: 8.28.2High Fallsparent cityCounty: 5.45.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in High Falls

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from High Falls, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Ulster County average of 6.1 and below the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 34th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 36111952901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36111952901?

Census tract 36111952901 in High Falls scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36111952901?

Median gross rent is $1,203/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36111952901?

12.6% of residents in tract 36111952901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,820.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36111952901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 62th, minority 25th, housing 45th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 36111952901 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 36111952901 compare to High Falls overall?

Tract 36111952901 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of High Falls at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from High Falls; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related