Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Crestwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tuckahoe

Tract 36119004802 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,009 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.5/10 for census tract 36119004802 reflects conditions in Crestwood in Tuckahoe, New York. It lands near the 86th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,493 a month against an average household income of $125,125 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 21% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units1,478
Renter share58.9%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$125,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Crestwood
Elevated
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tuckahoe
Very High
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#117 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Moderate
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3,602 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tuckahoe and the region

Centroid at 40.9558, -73.8202 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestwood scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,493 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tuckahoe
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tuckahoe
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tuckahoe
7.6

How Crestwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 004802Tuckahoe: 8.98.9Tuckahoeparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crestwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestwood

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tuckahoe, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Westchester County average of 6.1 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119004802

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119004802?

Census tract 36119004802 in the Crestwood neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119004802?

Median gross rent is $1,493/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119004802?

8.3% of residents in tract 36119004802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,009.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119004802?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 23th, minority 68th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 36119004802 considered part of Crestwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119004802 fall within Crestwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119004802 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119004802 compare to Tuckahoe overall?

Tract 36119004802 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Tuckahoe at 8.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tuckahoe; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119004802 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tuckahoe

Top eight tracts in Tuckahoe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related