Crestwood Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tuckahoe
Tract 36119004802 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,009 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 7.8/10, tract 36119004802 in the Crestwood area of Tuckahoe, NY reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Against Westchester County at 47.2%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Tuckahoe and the region
Centroid at 40.9558, -73.8202 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crestwood scores 7.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Crestwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 23%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 68%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 55%Grade B
- 23%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Crestwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.5%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.9%Food insecurity
- 7.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 5.4%No health insurance
- 13.4%Frequent mental distress
- 20.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Crestwood
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. At $1,493 a month, rents run 31% under what the rest of Tuckahoe commands.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Food insecurity runs 9.9% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.5% against 15.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $125,125, annual rent is just 14%. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 36119004802
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119004802?
What is the average rent in tract 36119004802?
What is the poverty rate in tract 36119004802?
How socially vulnerable is tract 36119004802?
Is tract 36119004802 considered part of Crestwood?
What share of households in tract 36119004802 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 36119004802 compare to Tuckahoe overall?
Was tract 36119004802 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Tuckahoe
Top eight tracts in Tuckahoe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.