Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Chappaqua Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 36119013102 ·
Westchester County, NY · pop 6,687 · 38% of tract blocks fall in Chappaqua
Tract 36119013102 sits in Chappaqua, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. Population here is 6,687. It sits 2.9 points below the Westchester County average of 7.8.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 12%Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,357
Renter share19.6%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Chappaqua
Moderate
Within county
3th percentile
#234 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Very Low
Within state
9th percentile
#4,918 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
National
59th percentile
#34,278 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chappaqua and the region
Centroid at 41.1592, -73.7369 · click any tract to drill in
Why Chappaqua scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chappaqua
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,697 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chappaqua
1.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chappaqua
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chappaqua
1.6
How Chappaqua compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.2%Housing insecurity
3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
4.8%Food insecurity
3.2%SNAP enrollment
3.3%Transit barriers
2.8%No health insurance
10.9%Frequent mental distress
15.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Chappaqua
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.2/10.
Disability prevalence runs 15.7% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, housing-court posture reads 1.6/10. Cost burden runs 39% here against 47.2% across Westchester County.
Food insecurity runs 4.8% against 17.8% nationally. Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $2,697, 14% above the Chappaqua average.
That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 36119013102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119013102?
Census tract 36119013102 in Chappaqua scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36119013102?
Median gross rent is $2,697/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36119013102?
2.9% of residents in tract 36119013102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,687.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36119013102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 48th, minority 37th, housing 12th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 36119013102 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 36119013102 compare to Chappaqua overall?
Tract 36119013102 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Chappaqua at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chappaqua; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.